++ 0% (Reading text)
++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
++ 20% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 23% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 26% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 29% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 32% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 35% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 38% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 41% (Generating code)
++ 44% (Generating code)
++ 47% (Generating code)
++ 50% (Generating code)
In the sentence 'let MAX2 be the number of non-empty things incorporated
by the TENUTO'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 19),
I was expecting to read a description of values, but instead found some
text that I couldn't understand - 'non-empty things incorporated by the
TENUTO'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
number of (non-empty things incorporated by the tenuto - description of
values)
But I didn't recognise 'non-empty things incorporated by the tenuto'.
In the sentence 'if the TENUTO is not closed and the TENUTO is not
empty' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, it looks as if you intend 'the
TENUTO is not empty' to be a condition, but that seems to involve applying
the adjective 'empty' to a thing - and I have no definition of it which
would apply in that situation. (Try looking it up in the Lexicon part of
the Phrasebook index to see what definition(s) 'empty' has.)
I was trying to match this phrase:
if (tenuto is not closed and the tenuto is not empty - a condition):
I recognised:
tenuto is not closed and the tenuto is not empty = a condition
In the sentence 'repeat with PARTE running through the non-empty things
incorporated by the TENUTO'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 26),
I was expecting to read a description of values, but instead found some
text that I couldn't understand - 'non-empty things incorporated by the
TENUTO'.
I was trying to match one of these phrases:
1. repeat with (parte - a new name) running through (non-empty things
incorporated by the tenuto - description of values):
2. repeat with (parte - a new name) running through (non-empty things
incorporated by the tenuto - list of values):
But I didn't recognise 'non-empty things incorporated by the tenuto'.
The name 'parte' doesn't yet exist.
In the sentence 'if IDX2 is less than MAX2 minus 1'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 30),
I was expecting to read an arithmetic value, but instead found some text
that I couldn't understand - 'MAX2'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
(max2 - arithmetic value) minus (1 - arithmetic value)
But I didn't recognise 'max2'.
In the sentence 'if IDX2 is less than MAX2 minus 1'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 30),
I was expecting to read an arithmetic value, but instead found some text
that I couldn't understand - 'MAX2'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
(max2 - arithmetic value) minus (1 - arithmetic value)
In the sentence 'if PARTE is a container'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 34),
I was expecting to read a condition, but instead found some text that I
couldn't understand - 'PARTE is a container'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
if (parte is a container - a condition):
But I didn't recognise 'parte is a container'.
In the line 'say "[inp cui PARTE] [is-are a list of things in the
PARTE]"' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'inp cui
PARTE' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'inp cui PARTE' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.
In the sentence 'say "[inp cui PARTE] [is-are a list of things in the
PARTE]"' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting to read a
description of objects, but instead found some text that I couldn't
understand - 'things in the PARTE'.
In the sentence 'if parte is a supporter'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 36),
I was expecting to read a condition, but instead found some text that I
couldn't understand - 'parte is a supporter'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
if (parte is a supporter - a condition):
But I didn't recognise 'parte is a supporter'.
In the line 'say "[sup cui PARTE] [is-are a list of things on the
PARTE]"' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'sup cui
PARTE' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'sup cui PARTE' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.
In the sentence 'say "[sup cui PARTE] [is-are a list of things on the
PARTE]"' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting to read a
description of objects, but instead found some text that I couldn't
understand - 'things on the PARTE'.
In the sentence 'let MAX2 be the number of non-empty things incorporated
by the INDOSSATO'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 54),
I was expecting to read a description of values, but instead found some
text that I couldn't understand - 'non-empty things incorporated by the
INDOSSATO'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
number of (non-empty things incorporated by the indossato - description of
values)
But I didn't recognise 'non-empty things incorporated by the
indossato'.
In the sentence 'if the INDOSSATO is not closed and the INDOSSATO is not
empty' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, it looks as if you intend 'the
INDOSSATO is not empty' to be a condition, but that seems to involve
applying the adjective 'empty' to a thing - and I have no definition of it
which would apply in that situation. (Try looking it up in the Lexicon part
of the Phrasebook index to see what definition(s) 'empty' has.)
I was trying to match this phrase:
if (indossato is not closed and the indossato is not empty - a
condition):
I recognised:
indossato is not closed and the indossato is not empty = a condition
In the sentence 'repeat with PARTE running through the non-empty things
incorporated by the INDOSSATO'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 61),
I was expecting to read a description of values, but instead found some
text that I couldn't understand - 'non-empty things incorporated by the
INDOSSATO'.
I was trying to match one of these phrases:
1. repeat with (parte - a new name) running through (non-empty things
incorporated by the indossato - description of values):
2. repeat with (parte - a new name) running through (non-empty things
incorporated by the indossato - list of values):
But I didn't recognise 'non-empty things incorporated by the
indossato'.
The name 'parte' doesn't yet exist.
In the sentence 'if IDX2 is less than MAX2 minus 1'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 65),
I was expecting to read an arithmetic value, but instead found some text
that I couldn't understand - 'MAX2'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
(max2 - arithmetic value) minus (1 - arithmetic value)
But I didn't recognise 'max2'.
In the sentence 'if IDX2 is less than MAX2 minus 1'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 65),
I was expecting to read an arithmetic value, but instead found some text
that I couldn't understand - 'MAX2'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
(max2 - arithmetic value) minus (1 - arithmetic value)
In the sentence 'if PARTE is an container'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 69),
I was expecting to read a condition, but instead found some text that I
couldn't understand - 'PARTE is an container'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
if (parte is an container - a condition):
But I didn't recognise 'parte is an container'.
In the line 'say "[inp cui PARTE] [is-are a list of things in the
PARTE]"' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'inp cui
PARTE' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'inp cui PARTE' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.
In the sentence 'say "[inp cui PARTE] [is-are a list of things in the
PARTE]"' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting to read a
description of objects, but instead found some text that I couldn't
understand - 'things in the PARTE'.
In the sentence 'if parte is a supporter'
(Leonardo Boselli/Standard Inventory IT.i7x, line 71),
I was expecting to read a condition, but instead found some text that I
couldn't understand - 'parte is a supporter'.
I was trying to match this phrase:
if (parte is a supporter - a condition):
But I didn't recognise 'parte is a supporter'.
In the line 'say "[sup cui PARTE] [is-are a list of things on the
PARTE]"' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'sup cui
PARTE' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'sup cui PARTE' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.
In the sentence 'say "[sup cui PARTE] [is-are a list of things on the
PARTE]"' standard inventory it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting to read a
description of objects, but instead found some text that I couldn't
understand - 'things on the PARTE'.
++ 53% (Generating code)
++ 56% (Generating code)
++ 59% (Generating code)
++ 62% (Generating code)
++ 65% (Generating code)
++ 68% (Generating code)
++ 71% (Generating code)
++ 74% (Generating code)
++ 77% (Generating code)
++ 80% (Generating code)
++ 83% (Generating code)
++ 86% (Generating code)
++ 89% (Generating code)
++ Ended: Translation failed: 22 problems found